Monday, 9 July 2012

The Million Dollar Outdoor Building

When I heard about the "Royal Reno" project, as it is so appropriately named, I was somewhat excited of the prospect of what might come to fruition in a new pavilion. However, once I received the "fundraising" package at my home my jaw hit the floor and my tune changed.... 1 million dollars.... WOW!!!

I then spent many hours looking over the fundraising materials to try and understand both the scope and the perceived need for such a mammoth facility. 

Last year sometime the committee sent out surveys to get our ideas for a new pavilion in the park, I even submitted a couple of my own ideas. 

So as I reviewed this information package, and I pondered... 
  • did they take all of the ideas and try to integrate them all into the plan?
  • is the cost is due to the large parking lot?
  • who asked for such a grand building?
  • is this going to interfere with the "Step dance and fiddle" campers?
  • is this project going to interfere with the Airstream club campers?
  • how did safety get overlooked with the entrance to the park?
The million dollars basically covers the cost of the building and the excavating. 

Also, be sure to review the package that you received closely, it is deceiving because most of the trails, parking lots and additional buildings are marked with the word "FUTURE" (so the cost does not cover the entire project). Furthermore, not only is the drawing misleading, but the actual cost of the project is actually more than the package tells you. The new entrance to the park (which has it's own safety issues) is being funded through a different project... that's right... it is being funded as a part of the controversial "Angled Parking" project! So, the cost is likely more in like 1.2 million dollars. And if you add phase 2 to the project, you could probably get close to 1.5 million dollars. Who knows what the real cost is and what kind of overruns will burden the EZT tax payer. 

And if you think the cost to the Township will stop there, you are wrong. There is a huge safety issue with the new proposed entrance to the park. These safety issues will most definitely result in lawsuits to the Township. The issues are:
  1. The proposed entrance is on the bend where Decew and Hendershot streets meet.
  2. Minerva street is just metres away from this entrance where most drivers turn towards the new entrance.
  3. This road is very busy and provides access to the arena, the soccer fields, the memorial hall, the public school and the medical centre for most residents that live on the east side of town.
  4. There is no sidewalk on the the park side of the street.
  5. There is no cross walk planned for this street.
  6. The street is very narrow.
  7. The street has no facility for bicycles.
So this new entrance is a safety nightmare and it is clear that the Committee and the Council are ignoring this fact. It will only end up costing the tax payer more money in lawsuits when someone is injured at this entrance.

Another concern is that this building is replacing a 30 year old building that barely gets used.... hmm maybe we don't need a new pavilion if the old one isn't getting a lot of use?? Maybe we don't even need a pavilion at all... Maybe Queens park isn't the best place for a pavilion... Maybe Queens park should be turned into more of a park than a parking lot with all sorts of pavement.... But, one thing is for sure, we certainly don't need such a large scale project.

And what makes a park a nice park? Trees right, well in order to build this new building, they will be cutting down 14 old growth trees... what a waste and for what? An outdoor palace that the majority of residents don't want.

I have now sent two emails to the "Royal Reno" Committee to voice these concerns and I've only received a response on one of them which took 10 days to receive a response and it has been more than a month since I last emailed the committee with no response. 

In both emails sent to the Committee, I asked them who is asking for a new bigger pavilion and they have not yet answered, I really don't think that there is an answer to the question and that's why they haven't yet answered the question.

In the conversations that I've had with residents, many do support a new pavilion, but they are in support of a much more reasonable project, something that is scaled back that can be funded by grants and township money alone!


In conclusion, Tavistock doesn't need a "Royal" pavilion, there are a number of other things that Tavistock could use before we a "1 million dollar outdoor building".

Return to this blog in the next couple of days to see what we think would be a better way to lay out the park to provide a much safer entrance.

Regards,
Jon

6 comments:

  1. Hi Jon -

    I haven't made up my mind one way or the other on this project, but your statement, "[b]ut, one thing is for sure, we certainly don't need such a large scale project" needs some justification.

    You also indicate that there are a number of other things we need before the pavilion.

    Can you explain? Why don't we need the pavilion, and what other things should we push for first?

    Mike

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mike,

      Thank you for your comments, all feedback is important and will help us form a better community.

      The "large scale" project comment is in reference to the "understanding of the Community" (from discussion I've had with residents) that we do not have more demand then we can handle at the two pavilions we have now. Therefore, the comment calls into question why are building a bigger one with a huge price tag? A new pavilion is OK and larger is OK, but does it need to be 100' x 60' with an additional patio area that is 85' x 22' and at a cost of over a million dollars?

      Next, the "number of other things" comment is in reference to the other items that I've heard about from the Survey. Most of those that I have spoke to included facilities for children like a splash pad (this being the most requested), a public pool, etc. In addition to these items, the Tavistock Public school is looking to replace their playground equipment in the near future as it is getting very old and well used. TPS is concerned that the equipment may soon not pass inspection. And stay tuned to this blog, as more ideas and updates will add to this list over time!

      Regards,
      Jon

      Delete
  2. Time for another letter to the editor.
    I agree, too much, too big and unnessary.
    July 4, 2012 council minutes state go ahead for pavillion, construction tenders out, start after the fair.
    Bob Routly

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are still unsolved issues with the 'Royal Reno' and how it will affect the Tavistock Fair. The Horse show may be no more.
    I heard the proposed pavilion size allows basketball to be played there.
    Janet Heinbuch

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unfortunately our councillors seem to be unable to admit they may have used bad judgement in approving this project. We have just returned from a world congress in which there were 17 countries involved. The economy of the world is not good and I am sure that the money from the township and our taxes that is being wasted on a pavillion that probably will not be used could be used in much better ways such as improving township roads. I strongly suspect that as with the lagoon, library, angled parking the township will do as they please.
    Chris Wiffen

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice post, thank you for sharing. You have really imparted useful knowledge. A very useful post I must say. Awesome content. I bookmarked it for future reference.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: This blog is a forum created for you the reader (and Tax Payer of Tavistock) to offer your comments and suggestions, please use the Comment section to offer your constructive comments.